immigration case results

When immigration says no, we go to work. Below are some of our reported decisions in which our lawyers acted as counsel — refusals set aside, appeals allowed, and status protected.

Federal Court of Canada — judicial review

  • Tabari v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 1172 — humanitarian & compassionate refusal; judicial review granted in part, with the temporary resident permit request returned for a fresh decision.
  • Oladotun v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2025 FC 1035 — Refugee Appeal Division decision quashed and remitted for redetermination.
  • Obasi v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2024 FC 746 — refused study permit set aside on judicial review.
  • Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v Howard, 2024 FC 111 — the Minister’s judicial review of an Immigration Appeal Division decision allowing a spousal sponsorship was dismissed; the family’s approval stood. Acted for the respondent.
  • Ola v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1272 — Refugee Appeal Division decision set aside and remitted for reconsideration.
  • Eromosele v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 898 — Refugee Appeal Division decision on identity set aside and remitted for redetermination.
  • Mukoro v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 294 — refused study permit set aside and returned for redetermination.
  • Ashiru v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 1313 — refused in-Canada humanitarian & compassionate application set aside on judicial review.

Immigration Appeal Division

  • Murillo v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2024 CanLII 21957 (CA IRB) — spousal sponsorship appeal allowed and the refusal set aside.
  • Howard v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), Immigration Appeal Division, 8 March 2023 (MC1-10063) — spousal sponsorship appeal allowed; subsequently upheld on the Minister’s judicial review (2024 FC 111).
  • Chin v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 CanLII 24476 (CA IRB) — spousal sponsorship appeal allowed and the refusal set aside.
  • Bashto v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), Immigration Appeal Division, 27 November 2019 (MB9-15418) — residency obligation appeal allowed and permanent resident status retained.

Our lawyers acted as counsel in each of the decisions above. Past results do not guarantee a similar outcome; every case is decided on its own facts.

Book a Consultation